Howdy all, been awhile since I posted--busy busy busy at work. Now I'm sidelined with the cold/flu bug that everyone seems to be getting (and as all parents know, "middle/high school" = "viral/bacterial factory"). I'm between lapses of consciousness just now, so I reckon I'll crank out a post. And what I thought I'd write about is hard currency.
I read in the NYT a week ago that the U.S. Treasury is issuing a new dollar coin--or rather, a whole new series of them, cycling through the presidents over the next few years.
This is cool in and of itself, but I wonder if they think it will finally take hold as a replacement for the $1 bill? If that's the plan, then this would be what, "take five" or something? It's a good idea, really. A day after the NYT piece, I saw a related article in the Globe and Mail (a national Canadian paper); it had a good summary of why coins are more sensible than paper for low-currency amounts (and I've seen these same arguments from our past attempts at a dollar coin):
It costs about 20 cents (U.S.) to make a dollar coin but they last for 30 years or more. The $1 notes cost only four cents apiece but they have to be replaced every 21 months.-- and --
"We [in the vending-machine industry] estimate that we lose at least $600-million in sales every year because of poor-quality dollar bills,"...quoth some vending-machine industry High Up [aside: "Exec in the Vending Machine Industry" appears high on my list of "Most Incredibly Boring Ways to Make Lots of Money."].
The vending argument doesn't interest me as much as the longevity point. As the G&M article mentions, it has been estimated that switching to a dollar coin would save the ol' U.S. gummint roughly $0.5B per annum, and that's not chump change. We'll see if this one takes off. In any case, I want one of those Washington dollars (so, everyone who reads this, please send one along...) Next time we're over the border in Maine, I will have to see if I can track one down.
Up here, the lowest paper bill you'll find is $5. The $1 coin was introduced in the late '80s and soon became popularly known as a loonie, since the reverse depicts a loon. Or maybe they thought Elizabeth II (shown on the obverse) was a nutter...
Nearly a decade later, in '96, the Canadian mint issued the $2 coin, and it was only nat
Speaking as a Yank, I find these "big coins" take some getting used to. I mean, when I'm walking around in the States, and I hear and feel a handful of change jingling in my pocket, odds are good Ive got something like $1.86 in there. Play the same scene up here, and I might have $12.86. You wouldn't think so just to hear me say it, but I'm telling you, it takes time to adjust--you're at a store buying something that costs $7 or $8, and you start to think, $#^@#!, I've only got some pocket change...but it's plenty. A friend of mine in Raleigh regularly drops all of his loose change into a large jar; when it's full, it goes toward "fun" purchases. If you did that here, your jarful would buy you a Nintendo Wii (now watch Sheehan scramble to find a jar).
I was going to end the post here, but Kimm asked me to add a bit about the newly minted Breast Cancer Awareness quarter in Canada; she got one today. I hadn't heard about these until now; well played, Canada.
Note: yeah, I know the coin images look ucky with their white backgrounds. No Photoshop on this ThinkPad, and I'm feeling too blah to go spritz 'em up on my other box.
[End of numismatic rambling.]
[You can wake up now.]
9 comments:
[obligatory_ethnocentric_comment]
So, what is $12.86 in REAL money?
[/obligatory_ethnocentric_comment]
Hey, this reminds me of a little teaser:
You decide to go in with two friends on a little bit of business. Because of the amount of work involved, you decide that you are going to split the proceeds 1/2, 1/3, and 1/9 before you do any work. You end up making 17 gold coins. How do you split the proceeds?
heh "real" money, oy gevalt. Another friend of mine likes to make the same faux jingoist comments. I'll post plenty more, over time, on money and relative cost of various things. But I'm telling you, it's funny how easy it is to keep making the comparison in your head. You see something that's a good deal in $ CDN, and so you say to yourself, "Well that's *really* a good deal when you factor in the conversion rate." Which is silly, since the conversion rate doesn't mean beans to me, in a daily context. It only matters for the debt I left down there and for travel plans. Interesting pschologicalish stuff, here...
You end up making 17 gold coins. How do you split the proceeds?
A reciprocating saw and/or a smelter, and a really accurate scale?
A reciprocating saw and/or a smelter, and a really accurate scale?
The answer is you take a gold coin from your pocket and add it to the pot. Then the equation works out:
18/2=9, 18/3=6, 18/9=2. That comes out to 9+6+2=17, with a coin left over, which you put back in your pocket.
The context I read it was as an allegory for God. God changes the equation and the outcome, without being changed himself. I thought it was quite a powerful idea. YMMV.
Am I like, the only one that did not understand any of that? Well, that's just dad.
I was told there would be no math. ;-)
I was told there would be no math. ;-)
Absolutely hilarious. They told me that too. Now, every time I hear that there is going to be no math, I'm fairly certain there will be...
Well, being an architect, you'd think that I would realize that there "will be math"...but I still can still hope, can't I? A girl always needs to have hope, or at least a fabulous engineer to work with.
You see something that's a good deal in $ CDN, and so you say to yourself, "Well that's *really* a good deal when you factor in the conversion rate."
I find myself doing the reverse of that in the US. I see an item that I want and think to myself (BTW - so much more convenient than thinking to others), "If I bought this in Brasil it would cost me triple what it is here at Best Buy. Better get it while I'm here."
I'm surprised the supply-siders haven't moved to re-index the currency to something like 1950's levels. They'd have to shutter the mints for a few years, but once a coke was back to a $.05 and gas was $.13/gallon (what is that, like $7.20/mL CDN?), there would be a spending orgy the likes of which only Imelda Marcos could fathom. By the time that people realized they were only earning $1.15/day (or $10x10-4/msec CDN) the US economy would be back to Great War levels.
Somebody get Laffer another napkin.
Post a Comment